Hey! I'm Katasandra, one of the local Scouts. I have come here to review your guide, you requested one a lil bit ago and here I am! I'll try my best to give pointers on what areas you can improve your guide on. I hate just saying 'this isn't good', and I'll try my best to give advice on how I would improve certain things (as if it were my own guide). I'd also like to add that I haven't been super involved in the game recently, so in regards to build-specific comments I urge you to try to think critically about your choices and their justification

How does it work:I'll go into three 'main' topics: Content, Language/Writing and Coding/Visuals. I believe all three are core ingredients of a guide. Just knowing your champ is not enough. You also have to make sure you can actually convey all this precious knowledge to your readers!I'll specify these categories as well as some subcategories and for that I'll use the following rating system:

Content

>Cheatsheet: It's alright

1. Upon viewing the notes of the rune pages I am overwhelmed quite quickly. Most of their descriptions focus on the perks (most of the time: damage). But I miss a bit of in what type of matchups/lanes/games I could take one over another. I would skip generic statements as 'good keystone/rune for lethality build' and merely focus on picking one rune over the other, or what really makes 'identifies' a keystone. For instance, both DH and PtA give additional damage, however what makes them really different from each other?
   
   
2. There is no need to list the Ornn upgrades. Ever since this has been changed to mythics only (during the items rework I think?), you don't really have to consider particular upgrades anymore. Including them mainly takes up space while not giving additional information.
   
   
3. It suites very well to give concrete examples of champions you'd pick certain things against. To give an example using the summoners spell part: wouldn't you agree that Exhaust works very well against (laning-wise) Tristana, Draven, Samira and Cleanse is superb vs Leona or Ashe?
   
   
4. I really appreciate the division between lethality and crit builds, perfect use of the build feature :)
   
   
5. (Both builds) The starting items are not accompanied by notes.
   
   
6. (Crit build) Why would you want to rush a Cloak of Agility (on your first base)? I'd argue this should be the last component buy before the mythic.
   
   
7. I think having an entire block/group dedicated to vision items is not really necessary and it takes up a lot of space.
   
   
8. The power of the cheatsheet comes from getting all important build information across as concisely as possible. This also applies to the situational items. You've mentioned their uses for some of them, however there is a large block of items without descriptions of when you'd take X or Y.
   
   
9. (Lethalithy build - full builds) I disagree with taking Black Cleaver into squishy teams. As you said, they have little armor. Why would you invest in more armor pen then? I think you'd be a lot better off with a The Collector or something like that.
   
   
10. There is a contradiction between the notes of the skill order (E-max) and that of the runes ( Arcane Comet). The runes tell you to take comet whenever you do E max while the skill order (lethality build) talks about DH stacks.
    
    
11. Some of the notes talk about take 'when you need X'. However, how do you know when you need that? Or: isn't it a better idea to straight up state the reason when you need the item? (thus skip mentioning X, which you can talk about in the item section)
    

>Setup (Runes/Items/Summoner spells): Needs some work

In general, whenever discussing build choices I strongly advise against giving exact numbers that can be found within the tooltips themselves. Not only is this information redundant (it's in the tooltips already), the abstract numbers also do not really give your reader additional information either. Similarly, try to avoid saying stuff like 'this item gives health' without any additional info. Again, this is redundant information. Saying things like 'the additional health of this item makes you resistant vs burst which is very helpful vs champs like X or Y' is much more meaningful in my opinion.

In general, it's worthwile to focus on when to take one choice (item/rune) over another. Merely reiterating their stats and mentioning its a good choice overall tends to make it hard for your readers to understand what to pick. After all, if there are several choices that are labeled as 'good', how can one ever try to pick between those, based on that information alone?

Summoner spells:

I very strongly disagree with taking Ignite on any ADC. Typically you are not close enough to use this summoner (at least, in a very effective manner). And even if you are, then I think Exhaust is a much better choice anyway.

Items:

1. What's up with the emphasis on ability haste in several places? I thought Miss Fortune either seeks to DPS through autoattacks (crit build) or to onetap people within one rotation (lethality build). Neither of these builds seeks to spam Make it Rain (which I imagine is the main reason for building haste). Unless you are going AP MF, It doesn't seem like its worth prioritizing ability haste over other stats.
   
   
2. The value of Farsight Alteration is insurmountable, it allows you to check objectives, prevent you from having to facecheck bushes and spot enemy flanks. Having to take any of the two other options (lens or stealth ward) should imo only be done in the event of gross negligence of your teammates.
   
   
3. Since MF is an ADC, I don't think it is a very good idea to dash towards enemies with Prowler's Claw. Sure, you can get funny oneshots when you are ridiculously fed, but you'll do that anyway in that case. I don't think this item offers additional value over Eclipse or Duskblade of Draktharr, and therefore I wouldn't mention it.
   
   
4. Keep in mind that slows don't stack. This means that Serylda's Grudge slow is surpassed by the slow of Make it Rain. Therefore, the slow on this item will only apply on Bullet Time itself and Double Up.
   
   
5. Rushing Infinity Edge is the most useless thing on this planet. Please don't recommend doing this.
   
   
6. I think building Guardian Angel is always preferred over building Zhonya's Hourglass. The extra Make it Rain damage will not really be prevalent, so you'd dedicate an item slot to just stasis. This isn't really worth it imo, especially considering that if you are running Bloodthirster + Overheal, the additional armor from Guardian Angel will make you deceptively tanky already (so you may not even need the revive/stasis anyway).
   
   
7. One thing I notice a lot is that you often talk about items being good in lane. However, in my experience the concept of 'laning' kind of stops beyond your 2nd item, so I don't understand how some of the situational items (which you probably buy after your core items) can help with laning.
   
   
8. I don't understand the mechanic you mention at Rapid Firecannon. Is this a bug? Some kind of mechanic that is not widely known?
   

Runes

• I'm not convinced of the perks of taking First Strike. Have you played with it, and how much gold does it generate throughout the course of a game?
  
  
• Relentless Hunter only gives out-of-combat ms, so you cannot use it to escape combat.
  

>Champion (Abilities/Tips&Tricks/Combo's):

This section is present in its most basic form: a copy of the ability tooltips etc. If you wish to expand on the guide, you can try to talk about some bread-and-butter combo's (not sure if MF has that many, but E + R is definitely worth a mention). Or alternatively on how to one can (properly) utilize different parts of her kit.

>Skin Showcase:

I think this section is a bit redundant. It doesn't really say anything (besides " Miss Fortune has many skins"), and it takes up a lot of space.

Code/Visuals

The information is formatted in a decent way. The use of templates makes the guide more or less neutral-themed. There are a lot of 'extra' things you can do in this department, however I'd argue this is perhaps more something to do if you're really into improving the visuals and willing to take coding to the next level (which can be quite time-consuming to learn. On the other hand, having freedom of formatting things whatever way you want them is nice too).

I'm not that fond of all the templates, especially the 3 column formatting of both the runes and items. I always find it hard to keep an overview in this particular format, and it really restricts your freedom (e.g. description length, asymmetry when number of items is not divisible by 3).

Writing/Language

This part is great, not really anything in particular to comment on (native speaker? ;) )

Overall thoughts

I think that you have pretty good basis here. However, I think it could be much better with some extra work. I think the main point of improvement lies in your items/runes sections (and perhaps sprucing up the cheatsheet a bit). Right now, many of the explanations are too much "yeah this item/stats are GOOD" and not enough "buy in X situation" (avoid saying when you need X stat, but focus on why/when do you need that stat).

In the spirit of focusing more on the (different) builds in your guide, it could be an idea to make a short section before items (or runes) with a generic explanation of what kind of stats you'd go for in certain situations/games/champ selects (which could also help in the item section itself). This way you can make some links between Miss Fortune's kit (which may not be so obvious to players unfamiliar with her). In addition, this may allow you to categorize some items (in the different builds itself), which can give you the ability to avoid having to explain everywhere on why you'd consider the item in the first place (as it has X stat).

I've now realized I've once again managed to generate quite a list of stuff. I hope it helps you (at least a little bit!), and if you have any questions or comments, feel free to reply!